I like to argue should i be a lawyer

How to Argue Like a Good Lawyer. When it comes to making an argument, great lawyers rely on three traits: Tenacity, objectivity and outcome-driven strategy. Read time: 2 minutes. Stay Cool At All Costs There is a good reason that lawyers have a reputation for being cold, emotionless creatures sharks, if you will : This kind of objectivity is what allows you to make informed, balanced decisions. It is the mark of an intelligent mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.

Some of the best arguments are not actually arguments at all but heated debates in which both people openly share opposing views, and walk away intellectually stimulated having learnt something new.

Lawyers are highly successful communicators because they know when to toe the line by respectfully listening to their opponents and when to bring down the hammer. Wherever possible, avoid emotion, stick to the point and foster a constructive discussion rather than a critical argument. This way, both you and your opponent walk away winners.

What strategies do you use when an inevitable disagreement surfaces in your personal or professional life? Let us know in the comments! Based in Sydney, Australia she enjoys wordplay, witticisms and spending time in obliging trees in Botswana. Lawyers are constantly careful about this reality. Regardless of what procedures the opponent uses to divert, threaten or move the conversational ground underneath.

Lawyers continually take the topic back to the first point. Thank you for all the hard work you put into it. It really shows. Your email address will not be published. It is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. The use of any materials or services or software is not a substitute for legal advice. Only a legal practitioner can provide legal advice. A legal practitioner should be consulted for any legal advice or matter. Free Trial Login. They identify the issue and never deviate from it.

Emotion makes it difficult for us to present a convincing argument. Negative displays of body language such as yelling, crying, sighing, eye rolling or name-calling is a waste of the mental energy required to win your argument. Emotion deafens us to conflicting points of view meaning your opponent can no longer hear what you are saying.

Even if lawyers are provoked, or are emotionally connected with a particular subject, they do not allow their opponent to use it to their advantage. It gives them the ammunition they need to focus their own strategy, distract you from your core objective and, ultimately, win the argument. A strategy often used by those with limited argumentative skills is to shift the overall dialogue.

This is achieved by drawing in related, but ir relevant topics. The debate slowly moves away from the central issue to similar sub-issues meaning that the original topic is never dealt with.

You will have noticed politicians using this strategy to avoid direct responses to journalists. The result is a circular debate that fails to progress the original topic or come to any solid conclusions. Introducing a secondary conversational theme is often an attempt to shift the conversational landscape to something your opponent is more comfortable discussing.